Best packaging supply store in Fountain Valley, California (CA) 2024

In our listing you'll find the best places from the packaging supply store category in Fountain Valley, California. Some of the most popular zip codes in Fountain Valley, CA for packaging supply store include 92708.
We found 1 place.

The UPS Store

This ups store has sent several of our Amazon return packages back late by almost two weeks. Most recently I paid for a certified mail package to be sent out, only to have it returned two weeks later by the post office because of unpaid postage. This was after I paid for everything and was even given a tracking number by this UPS store. To make a long story short, this store sent my package out without the proper paid shipping labels and it was returned to the local post office. I eventually had to pay to send it out again. I had only returned to this UPS store because I needed a notary. Along with a title and other important documents, this package was not sent out until two weeks after I had paid for the certified mail service. My registration was delayed due to the incompetency of the gentleman helping me and I was only notified of this because the mail was returned. Again, due to unpaid postage by this UPS store after I had paid and was even given a receipt with a tracking number. Do Not Go to this Scam of a UPS store! They will hang on to your packages including the Amazon returns and send them out late. I have no idea why they do this. Probably to cut corners and save money on their end. ~Tu

(10 reviews)
shipping and mailing service business center freight forwarding service mailbox rental service notary public office supply store packaging supply store print shop shredding service

FAQ packaging supply store in Fountain Valley, CA

What are the zip codes in the city of Fountain Valley?

City Fountain Valley has such zip codes as: 92708.

What are the highly rated packaging supply store in Fountain Valley, CA?

The best-rated places in category packaging supply store in city Fountain Valley are: